What Michael Moore's "Minutemen" Have Been Doing in Iraq

Via: The Jawa Report

Dr. Rusty Shackleford has images of true prisoner abuse performed by Moore's "Minutemen" of Iraq. There are some disturbing images that he has, so viewer discretion is advised.

For those who do not wish to look, I'll describe what I can:

The first eleven images shown are of the prisoners of the Jihadist before they were "executed" for no reason other than they were working for a free Iraq. The next two show the aftermath of a beheading of two Iraqi prisoners, their severed heads resting on their backs; the next two are images of an missing American and the ID's of the twelve murdered Nepalese workers; next is the bloody body of the murdered Japanese hostage Akihiko Saito; then an image of Margaret Hassan crying, probably before her murder; an Iraqi Interior Ministry official with a gun pointed at his head, before he was killed; then an image of the torture/slaughterhouse found after the liberation of Fallujah, an Iraqi translator murdered, and three of seven Iraqi civilian slaughtered, all by the Left's "freedom fighters."

The Left looks highly on these people. They believe that they are fighting for the "freedom" of all Iraqis. Yet, one look at these images, and you would think they are insane. Everyone harps about the Abu Ghariab prisoner abuse (which have already been beaten beyond death by the MSM), but they seem to turn a blind eye to the true prisoner abuse going on with the foreign terrorists who capture innocent men and women, then murder them.

Makes you wonder whose side the MSM is on.

How Radicals Respond to Satire

Looks like radical Muslims are attacking free speech on the Internet: Michelle Malkin's Denial of Service attack on her website.

The radicals are all bent out of shape over those Prophet cartoons, so what do they do? Riot, burn buildings/cars/whatnot, and hacking. I can understand their displeasure over the satire of their Prophet, but why commit destruction? This has all been orchestrated by radical imams from Denmark, which they also made up cartoons of the Prophet, one of which made him out to be a pig.

Somehow, I can't see Christians rioting over insulting images of Jesus Christ or the Virgin Mary.

Horse Dug up, Beaten Some More.

Some one please explain this to me: Why is it that the MSM would not publish the cartoons of Islam's Prophet for fear of angering Muslims, but they'll gladly publish so-called "new" images of the Abu Ghraib, knowing full well it will anger the Muslims for sure? (h/t: LGF.com)

What irks me is that the MSM is bringing this back to the forefront, even after all of those involved have already been prosecuted/or facing trials. Why now? Does the MSM think this will hurt Bush, since his popularity seems to be going up? Are they pandering to the Anti-American sentiments in the Islamic countries, to make America look worse than Saddam Hussein?

Like the title says, his horse had been beaten so much there isn't much left to put into a coffin. What a bunch of maroons the MSM has become.

State of the Union Address

Tonight, President Bush will give his annual address to the nation at 9PM. While I will not live-blog the event, Blogs4Bush will. They will have a transcript of the speech after it is over.

Enjoy the President's speech. I will probably be doing my college homework.

Ladies and Gentlemen...

I now introduce to you, the 110th Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States,
Associate Justice Samuel Alito. He was formally sworn in by Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts. He will join the other eight Justices for tonight's State of the Union address.

Associate Justice Alito was confirmed by 58-42 party line vote. It is sad that Alito, probably the most qualified judge to serve on the high court, had the vote like this, unlike the former ACLU lawyer Ruth Bader Ginsburg who got about 98 "Yea" votes. Sadly, partisan politics overrule qualified judges.

Hopefully, the country will move on from the vile partisanship of this and come together to better this country.

One Down, One to Go.

3rd Circuit Judge, and Supreme Court nominee, Samuel Alito passed the Judiciary committee by a party line vote of 10-8. The Senate will be debatting his nomination tomorrow, and, hopefully, have a vote by the end of the week, unless the Liberals have their way.

It is sad to see a well-qualified judge not get a full "Yes" vote from the committee based on partisan politics. Judge Alito should get over 90 votes, but there will the the Liberals who will oppose him no matter what.

They say that Alito is out of the "mainstream". What they really mean is that he does not conform to the Liberal mindset of rulings based on feelings and legislating from the bench.

Judge Alito will be confirmed to sit on the high court, no doubt. But, the Liberals in the Senate will make sure to tarnish his name and President Bush before that will happen.

What is going on here?

For those that have noticed, yes it looks messed up here. I made it like that. Just fiddling with the template and such. Hopefully, when I'm done, I'll like what I have done, and maybe you will to.

The things I would like to do is:

replace the background dots that they have;
make all the text contrast with the background;
add some images to the sidebar;
add some sort of special effects;
remove dead links and add some new ones;
and alphabetize the links.

Some of these will be easy, just add or remove the HTML tags and such. Others, not so. I may add others to this list. I'll update accordingly.

UPDATE: Finished with the modifying. I might change some things around later on, but overall, I'm happy with it.

Dang it.

Just found out that Blogger does not support TrackBacks (yeah, I know, too slow to have figured it out). So right now, I am looking for a free blogging service that will host TrackBacks. I'll still post here until I can find one and figure it all out. So, until then, enjoy this blog.

Ted Kennedy: "Alito's record troubles me deeply."

You wanna know why Judge Alito's record is so disturbing to Senator Kennedy-or to the Liberals for that matter-is that Alito does not follow the ACLU-style of judging. Alito believes in judicial restriant, which in today's judicial world, is absolutely necessary to prevent judges from imposing their twisted view onto America.

Judge Alito looks at the laws and facts of the cases that had came before him, and he judges accordionly. If the facts of the case says that something illegal has been done, he'll say so and rule as such. If there is no law broken, then he will rule so.

Judge Alito will be a fine addition to the Supreme Court of the United States. He'll look at every case with an open mind and judge the case based on facts and law, not what he feels.

The Samuel Alito Confirmation Hearings

Today, the Senate Judiciary Committee begins the hearings to question SC nominee Samuel Alito for the post being vacated be retiring Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Today, the members of the committee are giving their opening statements, and then Judge Alito will give his. The questioning will start tomorrow, I believe.

I am not gonna do any of the live-blogging stuff others are doing, so you're gonna have to go to another blog for it or listen to CSPAN (I think) or something like that. One blog that is following the hearings is Blogs4Bush. They would probably be posting transcripts of the statements and exchanges and such.

Here's hoping the Liberals don't try to hijack this to make it a circus and slander both Alito and the President, as well as other conservatives.